buddy

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
eyerolls-the-view
theslowesthnery

i don’t know how to tell people that deriving pleasure - sexual pleasure included! - from art* is good actually, and that creating specific kind of art “just” because you find it hot or whatever is just as good a reason as any, and you don’t actually need some “deep and meaningful” reason to create art about things. pleasure - sexual pleasure included - is not the devil, it is not Bad and shameful, and it’s not any less valid of a reason to create something than because you want to, idk, explore the depths of the human consciousness or something

* art here includes writing

theslowesthnery

Screenshot of a twitter post by the user bitethehands. The post reads: "People who act like erotic art is not art genuinely infuriate me bc they all have the same snobby pseudo intellectual attitude like it is in any way revolutionary to assert that Sex is Bad & not insanely catholic & lame to decry eroticism as cheap & dirty & shameful"
Second part of the twitter thread by the user bitethehands. The post reads: "These people will argue over and over again that fiction centred aroud sex is Bad and Cheap and should not be treated seriously, unless of course the sex is depicted non-erotically, in which case of it servers artistic merit!"
Third part of the twitter thread. The post reads: "Sex is fine as long as it isn't making anyone horny because that would be bad! Things only have artistic and intellectual merif if I derive no joy from them! This is a very normal and non-puritanical way to think!"